Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Terminology: This section explains special features of the language used by the individual authors. _____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bas van Fraassen on Terminology - Dictionary of Arguments
I 12 Constructive empiricism/Fraassen: Objective: empirically adequate theories. - Accept: requires only empirical adequacy (correct description of the phenomena), not truth. Pro Fraassen - The phenomena must fit into at least one model. I 90 Pragmatic/terminology/Fraassen: Fraassen calls the Tarski Truth-Definition "pragmatic."_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Fr I B. van Fraassen The Scientific Image Oxford 1980 |
||
> Counter arguments against Fraassen
> Counter arguments in relation to Terminology
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27